In a tale more twisted than a soap opera plot, we have a new development in the assassination attempt on President Trump. The latest revelation? An officer assigned to guard the roof during Trump’s rally abandoned his post and you won’t believe why.
According to reports, he abandoned his post because of—you guessed it—hot weather. U.S. Senator Josh Hawley is now grilling Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas for answers. In a biting letter, Hawley highlighted disturbing allegations from multiple whistleblowers that paint a picture of glaring security lapses.
According to a whistleblower, there was supposed to be law enforcement presence on the roof on that fateful day. But, as the mercury soared, at least one officer thought, “Nope, not today,” and abandoned his post. Apparently, concerns over the sweltering heat led to a reshuffling of personnel, leaving the rooftop unguarded.
Whistleblower accounts suggest that the officer didn’t just take a brief respite; they completely vacated the spot meant to be under constant surveillance. This raises eyebrows and questions about the planning and execution of security measures by the Secret Service. How could an agency known for its rigorous protocols allow such a glaring vulnerability?
Senator Hawley didn’t mince words in his letter, asking Mayorkas three pointed questions: When exactly did the individual abandon their post? Which law enforcement units were assigned to the rooftop duty? And did any personnel fail to report to their assigned stations that day? Simple yet vital questions that demand transparent answers.
https://twitter.com/worldnetdaily/status/1815502374548672851
Adding fuel to the fire, Fox News anchor Harris Faulkner lambasted Secret Service Director Kim Cheatle for not personally visiting the site of the shooting, even nine days after the incident. It’s like skipping the crime scene in an episode of CSI—unheard of and unprofessional.
Tucker Carlson took it further, interviewing talk-show host Jack Posobiec, who suggested that the government should be presumed guilty until proven innocent in this scenario. Carlson echoed these sentiments, calling out the Secret Service for what seems like a string of screw-ups. He questioned whether these failures were mere coincidences or part of a more sinister plot to allow Trump to be targeted.
The narrative becomes even more intriguing when considering Posobiec’s assertion: “I would say the burden of innocence is on the citizens and the burden of guilt is on the government.” It’s a statement that rings especially true in times of rising public skepticism toward governmental institutions.
Is this a case of negligence, incompetence, or something more insidious? As the investigation unfolds, the public remains on edge, awaiting explanations that may forever alter their trust in the agencies sworn to protect the nation’s leaders.
Leave a Comment