On January 6, 2021, the United States Capitol was the site of a significant event that shook the nation. As the world watched, a mob stormed the Capitol Building, resulting in chaos, violence, and the loss of lives. The aftermath of this event has been heavily debated, with conflicting narratives and allegations surfacing. One aspect that has received limited attention is the discovery of two pipe bombs near the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Republican National Committee (RNC) headquarters. This incident raises questions about law enforcement’s handling and the potential involvement of various parties.
Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, a member of the Select Subcommittee on the Weaponization of the Federal Government, has raised concerns about the pipe bombs’ origin and their potential connection to law enforcement. Massie, after meticulously reviewing thousands of hours of video footage and other evidence from January 6, believes that there is an ongoing coverup surrounding the incident.
According to Massie, the Democrats have avoided highlighting the pipe bombs’ discovery, which would seemingly support their narrative of a violent “insurrection.” He questions why they have not promoted this significant threat and suspects their involvement in the incident. Massie’s investigation has uncovered video footage showing law enforcement officers reacting nonchalantly to the discovery of the pipe bomb, even allowing children to walk near it. This raises doubts about their diligence and the seriousness with which they treated the situation.
The pipe bombs found outside the DNC and RNC headquarters on January 6 were a potentially deadly threat. However, the Democrat-run January 6 committee, chaired by Representative Bennie Thompson, omitted any significant mention of the pipe bombs in their final report. This omission is puzzling, considering the sensational nature of the incident and its potential implications.
Massie asserts that a pipe bomb poses a real danger, as it is designed to maim and kill. In contrast, the individuals protesting that day did not possess weapons with the intent to cause harm. The lack of attention given to the pipe bombs raises questions about the committee’s motivations and their commitment to a comprehensive investigation.
As the investigation into the pipe bombs unfolds, several contradictions and inconsistencies have come to light. The first point of contention is the Secret Service’s failure to detect the pipe bomb that was planted just 30 feet away from where Vice President Kamala Harris was present. Despite conducting a sweep before her arrival, the bomb went unnoticed, raising concerns about the effectiveness of security measures.
Another puzzling aspect is the quality of the video footage provided by the DNC. Former top FBI Washington official Steven D’Antuono testified that the footage turned over by the DNC was of lower quality than expected, hindering the identification of the suspect. Furthermore, data from a cell phone company, which could potentially provide crucial information about the suspect, was corrupted, according to D’Antuono’s testimony. These inconsistencies cast doubt on the thoroughness of the investigation and raise suspicions about deliberate obfuscation.
The FBI has described the pipe bombs as “viable,” suggesting that they were capable of causing significant damage. However, upon closer examination, it becomes apparent that the bomb’s design rendered it incapable of exploding on January 6. The bombs were connected to a 60-minute kitchen timer, which lacks the necessary electrical impulse to ignite an explosion. Massie, an engineer, highlights that a battery is required to trigger such a device.
The FBI’s refusal to disclose whether the pipe bombs contained a battery raises further doubts about the accuracy of their assessment. While the FBI claimed that the bombs would have exploded, D’Antuono admitted under oath that a 60-minute timer could not set off a device more than 17 hours later. These discrepancies and the lack of transparency from law enforcement agencies only serve to deepen the suspicions surrounding the incident.
One crucial aspect of the investigation is the person who allegedly discovered the pipe bomb at the DNC headquarters. Massie insists on the need to question this individual, as their account could shed light on critical details. He wonders why the search for the third bomb seemingly ended after the discovery of two. The failure to intensify the search and employ resources like bomb-sniffing dogs raises concerns about the thoroughness of the investigation.
Revolver News, a media outlet, has brought attention to additional videos related to the incident that have not been released to the public. Their reporting suggests that law enforcement possesses alternate footage of the suspect planting the bomb on January 5. The withholding of these videos raises questions about the transparency and completeness of the investigation.
The handling of the pipe bomb incident raises doubts about the competence and effectiveness of law enforcement agencies involved. The FBI’s inability to identify the suspect, despite offering a substantial reward for information, is perplexing. The suspect managed to walk six blocks between the two locations, passing through one of the most heavily policed areas in the world, without detection.
Massie visited the alley where the second pipe bomb was found and discovered numerous cameras installed by private individuals. Surprisingly, area residents claim that the FBI did not approach them for information until nearly a year later. These oversights and the delayed investigation undermine public confidence in the agencies responsible for ensuring national security.
The controversy surrounding the January 6 pipe bombs demands answers. The involvement of law enforcement, the negligence in handling the incident, and the inconsistencies in the investigation raise significant concerns. As the truth remains obscured, it becomes increasingly vital to hold those responsible accountable and to uncover the full extent of the events that transpired on that fateful day.
The ongoing coverup alleged by Congressman Massie and the unresolved questions surrounding the pipe bombs underscore the need for transparency and a comprehensive examination of the events of January 6. Only by addressing these concerns can the nation begin to heal and restore faith in its institutions.
Leave a Comment