Sponsored

BREAKING: New Horowitz Report Reveals SHOCKING Findings Regarding J6 Crowd

A new report from Justice Department Inspector General Michael Horowitz has ignited fierce debate after shedding light on the FBI’s role during the January 6 Capitol breach. The lengthy, 84-page investigation, which examines the actions of FBI confidential human sources (CHSs) present at the event, has left Americans interpreting its findings through vastly different lenses.

On one side, figures like left-wing commentator Brian Krassenstein have hailed the report as proof the FBI had no undercover operatives orchestrating or instigating the events. “See? The FBI didn’t direct anyone to break the law on January 6!” they proclaim. But many critics online were quick to ridicule such conclusions, pointing out the absurdity of the FBI essentially investigating itself and declaring no wrongdoing. As one user quipped, “Well, that’s reassuring — a government agency confirming it did nothing wrong. Nothing to see here, right?”

However, digging deeper into the report reveals details that are far more complex — and far more troubling. The report acknowledges that 26 confidential human sources were present at the Capitol grounds that day. Of those, four actually entered the Capitol building itself, while thirteen others entered restricted areas surrounding the building. The remaining nine CHSs did not cross into any prohibited zones.

Critics immediately questioned why none of these sources appear to have faced any legal consequences, especially given the aggressive prosecution of regular citizens who wandered into similar areas. Many wonder if the presence of so many FBI-affiliated individuals contributed to the chaotic scene, further fueling suspicions that January 6 was a setup.

Horowitz’s investigation also detailed that three of these CHSs were specifically tasked with being present by various FBI field offices, while the others attended on their own volition or due to unrelated assignments. Even more damning, at least one source was reimbursed for travel expenses related to their attendance. This raises questions about how “independent” these actions truly were.

While the report attempts to exonerate the FBI, for many Americans, the unanswered questions remain louder than ever.

More Reading

Post navigation

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *